KNIGHT

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Snow, 748 F.2d 928 (4th Cir. 1984)
  …urn within thirty days or else suffer a dismissal, as did other defendants in sister cases who were still in escapee status when their cases were scheduled for argument. See, e.g., Van Blaricom v. Forscht, 490 F. 2d 461 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 915, 96 S.Ct. 222, 46 L.Ed.2d 144 (1975) (prisoner’s appeal will be reinstated if he returns to custody within thirty days of the issuance of the court order); United States v. Eberhardt, 467 F. 2d 578 (5th Cir.1972) (prisoner’s appeal removed from dock…
• Klein v. Smith, 559 F.2d 189 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …(2d Cir. 1971). Since this court has recently had occasion to review in some detail the case law in this and other Circuits concerning intrusions into the attorney-client relationship, United States v. Gartner, 518 F. 2d 633 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 915, 96 S.Ct. 222, 46 L.Ed.2d 144 (1975), we find it unnecessary again to discuss the distinction between those circumstances mandating the application of a per se rule of reversal and those less egregious instances of Governmental misconduct in which w…
• United States v. Steele, 727 F.2d 580 (6th Cir. 1984)
  …t Trammel commented: “Bullshit, they ain’t gonna believe that.” The appellants categorized Trammel’s presence in the jail as the invasion of an “agent” in the defense camp, and rely on United States v. Gartner, 518 F. 2d 633 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 915, 96 S.Ct. 222, 46 L.Ed.2d 144 (1975), in asserting a constitutional violation. In Gartner the court stated: [W]hen conduct of a government agent touches upon the relationship between a criminal defendant and his attorney, such conduct exposes the g…