KOPAS ET UX.

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• United States v. Bufalino, 576 F.2d 446 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …27, 229, 74 S.Ct. 450, 98 L.Ed. 654 (1954). But Remmer and its progeny apply only where the third-party contacts involve a “matter pending before the jury.” See id. As we stated in United States v. Brasco, 516 F. 2d 816, 819 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 860, 96 S.Ct. 116, 46 L.Ed.2d 88 (1975): “[w]here an unauthorized private communication, contact, or tampering with a juror during a trial does not relate to a matter pending before the jury, there is no right to a new trial absent a showing of prejudic…
• United States v. Moten, 582 F.2d 654 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …trial by failing to request such an interview during trial, (III) the judge apparently believed that a post-trial interview of jurors by counsel would be improper, for he cited United States v. Brasco, 516 F. 2d 816, 819 n.4 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 860, 96 S.Ct. 116, 46 L.Ed.2d 88 (1975), in which this Court criticized a “planned, systematic, broad-scale, posttrial inquisition of the jurors by a private investigator . . . .” DISCUSSION The Sixth Amendment provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecu…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Mennuti, 679 F.2d 1032 (2d Cir. 1982)
  …y, as contemplated by the agreement, still existed and that “one overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy occurred” no more than five years prior to the filing of the indictment. United States v. Brasco, 516 F. 2d 816, 818 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 860, 96 S.Ct. 116, 46 L.Ed.2d 88 (1975). Mennuti asserts that the object of the conspiracy was to acquire control over the CNA check and that when the check was acquired, concededly outside of the limitations period, the conspiracy ended. We think it a…