MONTGOMERY

v.

DOUGLAS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• William C. Haas & Co., Inc. v. City & Cnty. OF SAN Francisco, 605 F.2d 1117 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …) Haas’ efforts to foreclose application of the environmental laws to it on constitutional grounds failed in the California judiciary and in the United States Supreme Court. (William C. Haas & Co., Inc. v. Russian Hill Improvement Association (1975) 422 U.S. 1030, 95 S.Ct. 2646, 45 L.Ed.2d 687 (dismissing appeal for want of substantial federal question).) With the invalidation of its site permit, Haas had to start all over again. By this time, however, Haas faced insurmountable barriers to its high-rise pro…
• Fed. Election Comm'n v. MacHinists Non-Partisan Political League, 655 F.2d 380 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …courts which was endorsed in Buckley appeared in United States v. National Committee for Impeachment, 469 F. 2d 1135 (2d Cir. 1972); ACLU, Inc. v. Jennings, 366 F.Supp. 1041 (D.D.C.1973) (three-judge court), vacated as moot sub nom., Staats v. ACLU, 422 U.S. 1030, 95 S.Ct. 2646, 45 L.Ed.2d 686 (1975); and Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F. 2d 821 (D.C.Cir.1975) (en banc), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 424 U.S. 1, 96 S.Ct. 612, 46 L.Ed.2d 659 (1976). “[I]n the candid service of avoiding serious constitutional doubt,…
• Bread Political Action Comm. v. The Fed. Election Comm'n, 635 F.2d 621 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …, 63 L.Ed.2d 413 (1980) (emphasis in original), quoting Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58, 70, 83 S.Ct. 631, 639, 9 L.Ed.2d 584 (1963). See, e. g., ACLU v. Jennings, 366 F.Supp. 1041, 1049-52 (D.D.C.1973), vacated sub nom., Staats v. ACLU, 422 U.S. 1030, 95 S.Ct. 2646, 45 L.Ed.2d 686 (1975) (FECA provision held to be a prior restraint even though the Court acknowledged that it technically did not resemble a typical licensing system because the Act designated the media, not the government, to act as…