IN RE DISBARMENT OF SIEGEL

Citator

Cited By

• Crawford v. Pittman, 708 F.2d 1028 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …1232a (1976)33 does not undermine the Act’s re [*1036] quirement that each handicapped child receive individualized consideration. In Wheeler v. Barrera, 417 U.S. 402, 416, 94 S.Ct. 2274, 2283, 41 L.Ed.2d 159, 172 (1974), modified on another ground, 422 U.S. 1004, 95 S.Ct. 2625, 45 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975), the Supreme Court noted that § 1232a was “directed primarily at the possibility of HEW’s assuming the role of a national school board The Court noted that the statute could apply to a federal court’s playing “…
• Powell v. Schweiker, 688 F.2d 1357 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …l 1, 1978, section 416.917. . Jones v. Liberty Glass Co., 332 U.S. 524, 531, 68 S.Ct. 229, 232, 92 L.Ed. 142 (1947). The Supreme Court, in Wheeler v. Barrera, 417 U.S. 402, 420, 94 S.Ct. 2274, 2284, 41 L.Ed.2d 159 (1974), modified on other grounds, 422 U.S. 1004, 95 S.Ct. 2625, 45 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975), declared that “comparable” does not mean “identical” for purposes of the statute providing for federal funding of special programs for educationally deprived children of public and nonpublic schools and requiri…