GUTWEIN ET AL.

v.

EASTON PUBLISHING CO.

Citator

Cited By (48 total)

• United States v. Evans, 572 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …18 U.S.C.A. § 203, and the unlawful gratuity statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 201, must be broadly construed in order to accomplish the legislative purpose which they manifest.29 See United States v. Anderson, 509 F. 2d 312, 333 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 991, 95 S.Ct. 1427, 43 L.Ed.2d 672 (1975); Parks v. United States, 355 F. 2d 167, 168 (5th Cir. 1965). The purpose of these statutes is to reach any situation in which the judgment of a government agent might be clouded because of payments or gifts mad…
• United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …t. The reason is that the appellants have raised this [*1173] claim that the notebook should be suppressed for Fourth Amendment violations for the first time at this appeal. United States v. Mauro, 507 F. 2d 802, 805-07 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 991, 95 S.Ct. 1426, 43 L.Ed.2d 672 (1975) (failure to raise suppression claim prior to trial makes motion to suppress at trial untimely under Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b) and 41(f)). The appellants did validly raise at trial, and have therefore preserved for th…
• United States v. Newton Wilkerson Anderson, Jr., 574 F.2d 1347 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …ion for New Trial, now pending in the district court. . The indictment charged a conspiracy that continued from October 8, 1973, to March 31, 1976. . In United States v. Anderson, 165 U.S.App.D.C. 390, 405, 509 F. 2d 312, 327 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 991, 95 S.Ct. 1427, 43 L.Ed.2d 672 (1975), the court suggested “[t]here is respectable authority for the proposition that a new-trial motion on the ground of false testimony, even without a claim that the prosecutor knew of the falsity, should under som…