ROSENTHAL

v.

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 3 OF THE TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Asarco Inc. v. Kadish, 490 U.S. 605 (U.S. 1989)
  …of any live case or controversy, we lack jurisdiction and thus also the power to disturb the state court’s judgment. See, e. g., Kansas Gas & Elec. Co. v. State Corp. Comm’n of Kan., 481 U. S. 1044 (1987); Times-Picayune Pub. Corp. v. Schulingkamp, 420 U. S. 985 (1975). None of the precedents cited by the parties, and none that we have found, is squarely on point. In Secretary of State of Md. v. Joseph H. Munson Co., 467 U. S. 947 (1984), the original defendant brought an appeal to defend the constitutiona…
• Burton v. Whittier Reg'l Vocational Tech. Sch. Dist., 587 F.2d 66 (1st Cir. 1978)
  …67); cf. Fortson v. Morris, 385 U.S. 231, [87 S.Ct. 446, 17 L.Ed.2d 330] (1966). Hadley, supra, at 58, 90 S.Ct. at 796. This case is not unlike that of Rosenthal v. Board of Central High School District No. 3, 385 F.Supp. 223 (E.D.N.Y.1974), aff’d 420 U.S. 985, 95 S.Ct. 1418, 43 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975), in which a two-tier system of selecting Board of Education members was held constitutionally sound. In Rosenthal, the voters in each of the local school districts elected the members of their own Board of Educa…
• Byrd v. City OF SAN Antonio, 587 F.2d 184 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …t their selection by the methods appellants urge would be required as a matter of law.4 See Sailors v. Board of Education, 387 U.S. 105, 87 S.Ct. 1549, 18 L.Ed.2d 650 (1967); Rosenthal v. Board of Education, 385 F.Supp. 223 (E.D. N.Y., 1974), aff’d. 420 U.S. 985, 95 S.Ct. 1418, 43 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975); Benner v. Oswald, 444 F.Supp. 545 (M.D.Pa., 1978). Appellants insist that the vacancy selection procedure denies them the Republican Form of Government guaranteed by the Constitution, because the Board has bee…