ALBEMARLE PAPER CO. ET AL.
v.
MOODY ET AL.; AND HALIFAX LOCAL NO. 425, UNITED PAPERMAKERS & PAPERWORKERS, AFL-CIO V. MOODY ET AL.
ALBEMARLE PAPER CO. ET AL.
MOODY ET AL.; AND HALIFAX LOCAL NO. 425, UNITED PAPERMAKERS & PAPERWORKERS, AFL-CIO V. MOODY ET AL.
420 U.S. 944
Supreme Court of the United States (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp. & Chrysler Realty Corp., 518 F.2d 751 (2d Cir. 1975)…t interests opposing clients of former firms. The Supreme Court presently has pending before it a question of the Sherman Act’s application to the legal profession and, in particular, minimum fee schedules. Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, No. 74-70 [420 U.S. 944, 95 S.Ct. 1323, 43 L.Ed.2d 422] (argued April 1, 1975). Whatever the decision in that case, we would think it inappropriate to relax ethical standards directed at preserving a sound attorney-client relationship in the name of the anti [*758] trust l…