KIRBY WALTER, APPELLANT,
v.
EDWARD JENNINGS, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1967-08-09
No. 743
ANDREWS, J., and SPECTOR, SAMUEL, and NANCE, L. CLAYTON, Associate Judges, concur.
201 So. 2d 786 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Kirby Walter, plaintiff, appeals a summary final judgment entered for the defendant, Edward Jennings, in a negligence action.

The court has carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs, and oral argument of counsel for the parties. From such consideration, no reversible error is found.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS, J., and SPECTOR, SAMUEL, and NANCE, L. CLAYTON, Associate Judges, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Wilton A. Ross v. State, 202 So. 2d 582 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)
    …evidence in civil cases shall obtain also in criminal cases, except in eases otherwise provided by law.” . Cox v. State, (Fla.App.1966) 192 So. 2d 11, 13. . Porter v. State, (Fla.1964) 160 So. 2d 104, 110. . See also Gates v. State (Pla.App.1967) 201 So. 2d 786, opinion filed August 8, 1967. . P.S. § 924.33, P.S.A. “When judgment not to he reversed or modified No judgment shall be reversed unless the appellate court after an examination of all the appeal papers is of the opinion that error was committed…
  • Kerlin v. State, 352 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 1977)
    …enied the objection, and on further cross-examination, petitioner could not recall the content of any conversation with his wife. The District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, affirmed the judgment and sentence “on the authority of Gates v. State, 201 So. 2d 786 (3d D.C.A., Fla.1967) and Ross v. State, 202 So. 2d 582 (1st D.C.A., Fla.1967).” This cause brings before us the application of the privilege for communications between husband and wife and, more particularly, the question of whether this privilege…
    1 / 3
  • Kerlin v. State, 351 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)
    …ions between spouses and hence such statutes have nothing to do with the instant case. Mercer v. State, supra; Porter v. State, 160 So. 2d 104 (Fla.1963); Ross v. State, 202 So. 2d 582 (1st DCA FLa.1967). The majority decision cites Gates v. State, 201 So. 2d 786 (3d DCA Fla.1967); Ross v. State, supra; Porter v. State, supra, and Mercer v. State, supra, as a basis for affirmance and so a discussion of them is in order. The Mercer holding has already been outlined and it obviously would require a reversal —…
    1 / 2

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw