COUSINO
v.
COUSINO; FIRST AMERICAN BANK & TRUST CO. ET AL. V. ELLWEIN, STATE EXAMINER AND COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, ET AL.; AUTOMOTIVE CHAUFFEURS, PARTS & GARAGE EMPLOYEES, LOCAL UNION 926, ET AL. V. NAPA PITTSBURGH, INC.; MONTGOMERY ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA; GASKINS V. TITEFLEX EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ASSN.; WILLIAMS V. DANA CORP.; BRYAN V. UNITED STATES; WHITLOW V. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR; QADIR V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ET AL.

U.S. | 1975-01-13
Nos. 73-6847; No. 74-187; No. 74-419; No. 74-5032; No. 74-5161; No. 74-5168; No. 74-5240; No. 74-5254; No. 74—5269
419 U.S. 1117 Supreme Court of the United States (1975) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Sterling E. Dorsey v. Solomon, 604 F.2d 271 (4th Cir. 1979)
    …in accordance with constitutionally adequate procedures, it is fundamentally unfair to require inmates whom the state has never proven committable to bear the burden of proving their suitability for release. The state relies on Kovach v. Schubert, 419 U.S. 1117, 95 S.Ct. 799, 42 L.Ed.2d 817, dismissing for want of substantial federal question 64 Wis.2d 612, 219 N.W. 2d 341 (1974), and Bolton v. Harris, 130 U.S.App. D.C. 1, 395 F. 2d 642 (1968), for the opposite conclusion, but both cases are inapposite. In…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw