CASSIUS

v.

ARIZONA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Hale, 422 U.S. 171 (U.S. 1975)
  …t of Columbia Circuit reversed, holding that inquiry into respondent’s prior silence impermissibly prejudiced his defense and infringed upon his right to remain silent under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 468 n. 37 (1966). We granted certiorari, 419 U. S. 1045, because of a conflict among the Courts of Appeals over whether a defendant can be cross-examined about his silence during police interrogation,2 and because of the importance of this question to the administration of justice. We find that the prob…
• Van Lare v. Hurley, 421 U.S. 338 (U.S. 1975)
  …ne, 497 F. 2d 1208 (1974). The three-judge court that was convened sustained the due process challenge to the New York rules. 380 F. Supp. 167 (ED & SDNY 1974). We noted probable jurisdiction of appellants’ appeal from the three-judge court holding, 419 U. S. 1045 (1974) (No. 74M:53), and also granted certiorari to the judgment of the Court of Appeals. 419 U. S. 1046 (1974) (No. 74-5054). We hold that the Court of Appeals erred in No. 74-5054 and reverse. Since in that circumstance we need not address the con…
• United States v. Alaska, 422 U.S. 184 (U.S. 1975)
  …er curiam opinion. 497 F. 2d 1155 (1974). We granted certiorari [*187] because of the importance of the litigation and because the case presented a substantial question concerning the proof necessary to establish a body of water as a historic bay. 419 U. S. 1045 (1974). II State sovereignty over submerged lands rests on the Submerged Lands Act of 1953, 67 Stat. 29, 43 U. S. C. §§ 1301-1315.3 By this Act, Congress effectively confirmed to the States the ownership of submerged lands within three miles of th…