MURGUIA

v.

INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Rojas, 537 F.2d 216 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …frequency of the transactions and amounts of the drug involved, appellant’s knowledge and intent that the cocaine he delivered to Valdez would be redistributed. See United States v. Sin Nagh Fong, 490 F. 2d 527, 530 & n. 3 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 916, 94 S.Ct. 2618, 41 L.Ed.2d 220 (1974). In such circumstances it is immaterial that appellant did not know the identity of lower links in the chain of distribution. United States v. Agueci, 310 F. 2d 817, 826-27 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied sub nom.…
• United States v. Mohan Mankani, 738 F.2d 538 (2d Cir. 1984)
  …t the intrusion of a human ear in similar circumstances is not an unlawful “seizure” of a conversation in a hotel or motel room. See, e.g., United States v. Agapito, supra; United States v. Sin Nagh Fong, 490 F. 2d 527, 530 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 916, 94 S.Ct. 2618, 41 L.Ed.2d 220 (1974); United States v. Ortega, supra; Ponce v. Craven, 409 F. 2d 621, 625 (9th Cir.1969). We conclude from the foregoing analysis that in order for the government to prove the constitutionality of its intrusion agai…
• United States v. Boone, 641 F.2d 609 (8th Cir. 1981)
  …pick up a larger amount of cocaine.” This evidence indicates that Boone, as a wholesale dealer, had a direct interest in seeing the drugs distributed by Hammond. See United States v. Sin Nagh Fong, 490 F. 2d 527, 531 [*612] (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 916, 94 S.Ct. 2618, 41 L.Ed.2d 220 (1974). This conclusion is further supported by Boone’s continued desire to sell drugs to Hammond in the following weeks. Although it is doubtful that any one of these factors alone would be sufficient to permit a ju…