WASNOWIC ET AL.

v.

CHICAGO BOARD OF TRADE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578 (3d Cir. 1982)
  …o submit the issue to the jury, see, e.g., United States v. Armocida, 515 F. 2d 49, 55-56 (3d Cir. 1975); United States v. Payseur, 501 F. 2d 966, 970-71 (9th Cir. 1974); United States v. Smith, 489 F. 2d 1330, 1334-35 (7th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 994, 94 S.Ct. 2407, 40 L.Ed.2d 773 (1974), entrapment is generally a jury question. See United States v. Lentz, 624 F. 2d 1280, 1286 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 995, 101 S.Ct. 1696, 68 L.Ed.2d 194 (1981); United States v. Bocra, 623 F. 2d 28…
• Calley v. Callaway, 519 F.2d 184 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …fair trial,” “continu[ing] the case until the threat abates” is one means of assuring a fair trial. 384 U.S. at 363, 86 S.Ct. at 1522. We agree with the statement of the court in Wansley v. Slayton, 4 Cir., 1973, 487 F. 2d 90, 93-94, cert. denied, 416 U.S. 994, 94 S.Ct. 2408, 40 L.Ed.2d 773 (1974), that “recency is a critical factor to be considered in connection with any claim of pre-trial prejudicial publicity.” In addition to the long time lapse of little publicity prior to trial, there was the period…
• United States v. DOG, 532 F.2d 1182 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …olated. Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 362, 86 S.Ct. 1507, 1522, 16 L.Ed.2d 600, 620 (1966); Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 721, 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1641, 6 L.Ed.2d 751, 755 (1961); Wansley v. Slayton, 487 F. 2d 90, 92-98 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 994, 94 S.Ct. 2408, 40 L.Ed.2d 773 (1974). With this contingency in mind, Fed.R.Crim.P. 21(a) provides for transfer of venue by the district court upon a motion by the defendant to that effect and a proper showing of prejudice. See [*1188] United States…