JAMES H. PRICE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS LAST DIRECTOR AND TRUSTEE OF JAMES H. PRICE & CO., INC., A DISSOLVED FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
AIRLIFT INTERNATIONAL, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES
JAMES H. PRICE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS LAST DIRECTOR AND TRUSTEE OF JAMES H. PRICE & CO., INC., A DISSOLVED FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
AIRLIFT INTERNATIONAL, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES
201 So. 2d 264
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
This interlocutory appeal is brought by one of several defendants to review an in-junctive order and an order appointing a receiver for that defendant. The receiver was appointed pursuant to the motion of the intervening Florida Securities Commission acting under authority of Sections 517.19(6) and 517.19(7), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.
Appellant contends that the statute does not authorize the injunctive order and the appointment of the receiver, and that if authorized the trial judge has abused the discretion vested in him by the statute. We hold that the record fully sustains the action of the chancellor, and that the statute clearly intended the action taken when necessary or advisable for the purpose of protecting the public.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Voyle C. Johnson v. Kruglak, 246 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)…igation is revealed by the prior appeals in the cause. Price v. Airlift International, Inc., Fla.App.1966, 181 So. 2d 549; Airlift International, Inc., v. Carr, Fla.App.1966, 187 So. 2d 908; Price [*619] v. Airlift International, Inc., Fla.App.1967, 201 So. 2d 264; Price v. Airlift International, Inc., Fla.App.1967, 203 So. 2d 374; Price v. Airlift International, Inc., Fla.App.1968, 210 So. 2d 765; Hewitt v. Price, Fla.App.1969, 222 So. 2d 247; Price v. Rome, Fla.App.1969, 222 So. 2d 252; Baya v. Price, Fla.A…
-
WEE MAC Corp. v. State, 301 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)…ird point does not present reversible error in view of the obvious need of the court for an accountant’s help in such actions and in view of the discretion vested in the court in such matters. See Price v. Airlift International, Inc., Fla.App. 1967, 201 So. 2d 264. Accordingly, paragraphs numbered “5” and “6” of the final judgment are reversed. In all other aspects the judgment stands affirmed. Affirmed in part, reversed in part.…