DOE ET AL.
v.
FLOWERS, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE

U.S. | 1974-04-15
No. 73-5954
Mr. Justice Douglas would reverse the judgment for the reasons set forth in his dissent in Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U. S. 651, 678 (1974); Mr. Justice Brennan dissents and would reverse the judgment for the reasons set forth in his dissent in Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U. S. 651, 687 (1974).
416 U.S. 922 Supreme Court of the United States (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • DOE v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 529 F.2d 638 (4th Cir. 1975)
    …ught for the class is injunctive and declaratory in nature . . .,” even “speculative and conclusory representations” as to the size of the class suffice as to the requirement of many. Doe v. Flowers, 364 F.Supp. 953, 954 (N.D.W.Va.1973), aff’d mem., 416 U.S. 922, 94 S.Ct. 1921, 40 L.Ed.2d 279 (1974). On remand, the district court will permit the suit to proceed as a class action, and will immediately issue its preliminary injunction to protect the class. VI. To reiterate, we hold CAMC’s anti-abortion poli…
  • Gaynell McCUIN v. Sec'y OF Health & Human Servs., 817 F.2d 161 (1st Cir. 1987)
    …Doe v. Charlestown Area Medical Center, 529 F. 2d 638 (4th Cir.1975). Finally, district courts may draw reasonable inferences from the facts presented to find the requisite numerosity. In Doe v. Flowers, 364 F.Supp. 953, 954 (N.D.W.Va.1973), aff'd, 416 U.S. 922, 94 S.Ct. 1921, 40 L.Ed.2d 279 (1974), the adoption of regulations designed to withdraw benefits from a class of AFDC recipients was held to be a reasonable basis for establishing the numerosity of that class. We agree that these principles have so…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw