RYNERSON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Fred "Freddy Campo" Campagnuolo, 592 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …he result in Pasha and make admissible communications to which a police officer is a party. We are constrained, therefore, to find no violation of Title III in this case.13 Accord, Flaherty v. State, 1973, 255 Ark. 187, 500 S.W. 2d 87, cert. denied, 415 U.S. 995, 94 S.Ct. 1599, 39 L.Ed.2d 893;14 State v. Vizzini, 1971, 115 N.J.Super. 97, 278 A. 2d 235. See also State v. Licciardello, 1969, 107 N.J.Super. 357, 258 A. 2d 382. 2. Violation of the discovery order. The district court also suppressed the evidenc…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Branch, 545 F.2d 177 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  …40 U.S.App.D.C. 70, 433 F. 2d 1176 (1970); Billeci v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 274, 184 F. 2d 394 (1950) and cases collected in the annotation “Telephone Communication — Interception,” 9 A.L.R.3d § 4 at 423, 431. See also Flaherty v. Arkansas, 415 U.S. 995, 94 S.Ct. 1599, 39 L.Ed.2d 893 (1974) (Douglas, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari). However, “[i]t has always been the custom of this court ‘in cases of serious criminal offenses, to check carefully the record for error prejudicial to defenda…
• United States v. Harmon Wesley Shields & Jack Vernon Quick, 675 F.2d 1152 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …. United States, 343 U.S. 747, 72 S.Ct, 967, 96 L.Ed. 1270 (1952). “The principle underlying them is that when one reveals information to an individual, one takes the risk that one’s confidence in that individual is misplaced.” Flaherty v. Arkansas, 415 U.S. 995, 999, 94 S.Ct. 1599, 1601, 39 L.Ed.2d 893 (1974) (Douglas, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari). Since the fourth amendment affords no protection “to a wrongdoer’s misplaced belief that a person to whom he voluntarily confides his wrongdoing wi…