TAYLOR

v.

INDIANA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Cosmo "Gus" Cangiano and Elana Marie Isola, 491 F.2d 906 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …spectively), the appellants argue that the permissible time period within which the Government must have been ready for trial was six months from the date of arrest. Rule 4; United States v. Scafo, 480 F. 2d 1312, 1316-1317 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1012, 94 S.Ct. 378, 38 L.Ed:2d 250 (1973). Before we can sensibly talk about the possible expiration of the six-month period, initial reference must be made to the periods excluded by Rule 5. United States v. Lasker, 481 F. 2d 229, 233 (2d Cir. 1973). R…
• United States v. Shepherd, 739 F.2d 510 (10th Cir. 1984)
  …ted a common perpetrator. See also United States v. Herbst, 565 F. 2d 638 (10th Cir.1977). This Court has affirmed convictions based upon uncorroborated accomplice testimony. E.g., United States v. Webb, 466 F. 2d 190 (10th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1012, 94 S.Ct. 378, 38 L.Ed.2d 250 (1973); United States v. Birmingham, 447 F. 2d 1313 (10th Cir.1971). However, we have been sufficiently concerned in such cases that we have found plain error requiring reversal if the trial court failed to give a jury…
• DiGIRLOMO v. United States, 520 F.2d 372 (8th Cir. 1975)
  …eived into evidence were copies authenticated by the certificate of the clerk of court and properly admitted. See United States v. Morris, 451 F. 2d 969, 972 (8th Cir. 1971); United States v. Hudson, 479 F. 2d 251, 253 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1012, 94 S.Ct. 377, 38 L.Ed.2d 250 (1973); 28 U.S.C. § 1733; Federal Rules of Evidence 902, see Pub.L.No. 93-595 (January 2, 1975) (effective July 1, 1975); McCormick on Evidence (2nd Ed. 1972) at 557. Affirmed. . The statute reads: Whenever a witness…