UNITED STATES STEEL CORP.

v.

TRUSTEES OF PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Vogue Optical Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Nat'l van Lines, Inc., 339 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
  …ortation charges and damage claims are adjudicated in a single suit. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Lindell, 281 U.S. 14, 50 S.Ct. 200, 74 L.Ed. 670 (1930); see also In re Penn Central Transportation Co., 477 F. 2d 841 (3rd Cir. 1973), aff’d, 414 U.S. 885, 94 S.Ct. 231, 38 L.Ed.2d 137 (1973). We therefore find that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s claim based on appellant’s failure to satisfy the subject conditions precedent to suit. Accordingly, this cause is remanded for further procee…
• Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc., 417 U.S. 467 (U.S. 1974)
  …loss and damage claims against amounts owed for transportation claims. That order, 339 F. Supp. 603, was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, 477 F. 2d 841, and by this Court, sub nom. United States Steel Corp. v. Trustees of Penn Central Transp. Co., 414 U. S. 885. The District Court in the instant case granted the trustees’ motion for summary judgment but set off one judgment against the other, which resulted in a net judgment in favor of respondent against the trustees in the amount of $11,017.01. The Cour…
• North v. Russell, 427 U.S. 328 (U.S. 1976)
  …sons similarly situated but residing in larger cities would be tried by a judge trained in the law. The Circuit Court denied relief on the basis of the Kentucky Court of Appeals holding in Ditty v. Hampton, 490 S. W. 2d 772 (1972), appeal dismissed, 414 U. S. 885 (1973). The Kentucky Court of Appeals in turn affirmed the denial of relief on the basis of Ditty v. Hampton, supra, noting that appellant could apply for bail in the event of an appeal from the Lynch Police Court judgment. 516 S. W. 2d 103 (1974).…