UNITED STATES
v.
B & H DIST. CORP. ET AL.

U.S. | 1973-06-25
No. 72-853
Mr. Justice Douglas would affirm. Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, dissents and would affirm the judgment of dismissal of the indictment charging appellees with a violation of 18 U. S. C. § 1462. See Miller v. United States, ante, p. 47.
413 U.S. 909 Supreme Court of the United States (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Bigelow v. Virginia (W.D. Pa. 1975)
    …e pendency of his appeal, Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. 113 (1973), and Doe v. Bolton, 410 U. S. 179 (1973), were decided. We subsequently vacated Bigelow’s judgment of conviction and remanded the case for further consideration in the light of Roe and Doe. 413 U. S. 909 (1973).4 The Supreme Court of Virginia, on such reconsideration, but without further oral argument, again affirmed appellant’s conviction, observing that neither Roe nor Doe “mentioned the subject of abortion advertising” and finding nothing in tho…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw