DADE COUNTY CROPPERS, INC.,
v.
H. S. WOOD

Fla. | 1937-03-22
Ellis, C. J., and Wi-iitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.
127 Fla. 493 Florida Supreme Court (1937)
Also reported at: 173 So. 345

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decree, holding that appellate courts should not overturn a chancellor's conclusions unless they are clearly erroneous. The court found no clear error in the chancellor's findings based on the evidence presented.


Holding

Yes, the chancellor's conclusions were correct because they did not appear to be clearly erroneous. Appellate courts generally defer to a chancellor's findings unless they are clearly wrong.


Key Quotes

“inasmuch as such conclusions do not appear to be clearly erroneous, the decree appealed from should be affirmed in accordance with the general rule that the appellate court will not overturn the conclusion reached by the chancellor from the testimony and evidence in the case unless it appears that such conclusion was clearly erroneous.”

This quote explains the court's reasoning for affirming the lower court's decision, emphasizing the standard of review for a chancellor's findings.

Facts & Procedural History

The case involved an appeal of a decree made by a chancellor. The appellate court reviewed the transcript of the record, briefs, and oral arguments pr…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This case having come on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the written briefs and oral argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the-sáme having been duly considered, it appears that the decision of this case depends upon whether or not the chancellor was correct in' his conclusions' upon the testimony *494and evidence in the case, and that inasmuch as such conclusions do not appear to be clearly erroneous, the decree appealed from should be affirmed in accordance with the general rule that the appellate court will not overturn the conclusion reached by the chancellor from the testimony and evidence in the case unless it appears that such conclusion was clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Wi-iitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw