OLD DOMINION BRANCH NO. 496, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS, AFL-CIO, ET AL.
v.
AUSTIN ET AL.
OLD DOMINION BRANCH NO. 496, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS, AFL-CIO, ET AL.
AUSTIN ET AL.
412 U.S. 917
Supreme Court of the United States (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (U.S. 1974)…ly have concluded that Gayle Graff’s relationship to the east bedroom was sufficient to make her consent binding on respondent. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the District Court in all respects. 476 F. 2d 1083. We granted certiorari, 412 U. S. 917, and now reverse the Court of Appeals. II It has been assumed by the parties and the courts below that the voluntary consent of any joint occupant of a residence to search the premises jointly occupied is valid against the co-occupant, permitting…
-
OLD Dominion Branch NO. 496, Nat'l Ass'n OF Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO v. Austin, 418 U.S. 264 (U.S. 1974)…First Amendment and federal labor law, and that the state courts had erred in interpreting the pre-emptive effect of Linn, we noted probable jurisdiction and set this case for oral argument with No. 72-617, Oertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., post, p. 323. 412 U. S. 917 (1973). We reverse. II As noted, this case calls upon us to determine the extent to which state libel laws may be applied to penalize statements made in the course of labor disputes without undermining the freedom of speech which has long been a b…
-
United States v. Robinson, 479 F.2d 300 (7th Cir. 1973)…y statement of the rule suggests, however, a question in every case such as this must be whether the third party who consents is in fact or in appearance a joint possessor. In United States v. Mattlock, 476 F. 2d 1083 (7th Cir. 1973), cert, granted, 412 U.S. 917, 93 S.Ct. 3006, 37 L.Ed.2d 1000, this circuit held that a defendant’s “constitutional rights could be waived only if it was proved [by the Government] that reasonable appearance of authority to consent existed and, also, that just prior to the searc…