TEXAS
v.
LOUISIANA; ROTHSTEIN ET AL. V. WYMAN, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEW YORK, ET AL.; OWENS V. UNITED STATES, LEBRUN V. CUPP, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT
TEXAS
LOUISIANA; ROTHSTEIN ET AL. V. WYMAN, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEW YORK, ET AL.; OWENS V. UNITED STATES, LEBRUN V. CUPP, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT
411 U.S. 988
Supreme Court of the United States (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rivers v. Schweiker, 692 F.2d 871 (2d Cir. 1982)…court “in wielding equity power, ... must weigh competing claims and determine where a preponderance of the equities lies.” Rothstein v. Wyman, 467 F. 2d 226, 234 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 921, 93 S.Ct. 1552, 36 L.Ed.2d 315 reh’g denied, 411 U.S. 988, 93 S.Ct. 2276, 36 L.Ed.2d 966 (1973). Social benefit programs, including the IAR, are dependent upon the cooperative efforts of federal, state, and local government. See id. at 232. In Rothstein v. Wyman, this Court balanced the equities and conclu…