CANTU
v.
UNITED STATES
CANTU
UNITED STATES
409 U.S. 1128
Supreme Court of the United States (1973)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 27 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (26 total)
-
United States v. Inadi, 475 U.S. 387 (U.S. 1986)…(declaration admitted under co-conspirator exemption “automatically satisfies the Sixth Amendment requirements”); United States v. Molt, 758 F. 2d 1198 (CA7 1985) (same); Ottomano v. United States, 468 F. 2d 269, 273 (CA1 1972) (same), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 1128 (1973). See Mueller, The Federal Coconspirator Exception: Action, Assertion, and Hearsay, 12 Hofstra L. Rev. 323, 361-362, and nn. 131-132 (1984). I realize that this was not the case here. However, the Court’s holding addresses all cases involvin…
-
United States v. DeLUNA, 763 F.2d 897 (8th Cir. 1985)…. 1005, 102 S.Ct. 1642, 71 L.Ed.2d 874 (1982); United States v. McManus, 560 F. 2d 747, 750 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047, 98 S.Ct. 894, 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978); Ottomano v. United States, 468 F. 2d 269, 273 (1st Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128, 93 S.Ct. 948, 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973). The declarants who were also co-defendants in the present ease are considered “unavailable” for the purposes of the confrontation clause because they exercised their fifth amendment right and chose not to testi…
-
United States v. Papia, 560 F.2d 827 (7th Cir. 1977)…ajudicial statements of a co-conspirator who does not take the stand at trial without risk of a reversal for violation of his codefendants’ rights to confrontation. Accord, Ottomano v. United States, 468 F. 2d 269, 273 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128, 93 S.Ct. 948, 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973); United States v. Cox, 449 F. 2d 679, 688-89 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 934, 92 S.Ct. 1783, 32 L.Ed.2d 136 (1972). But see United States v. Kelley, 526 F. 2d 615, 620-21 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denie…
Previewing 3 of 26 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence