MARTIN

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (scrap), 412 U.S. 669 (U.S. 1973)
  …e, post, p. 800. See in particular § 102 (2) (C) of the Act, 42 U. S. C. § 4332 (2) (C). Cf., e. g., Upper Pecos Assn. v. Stans, 452 F. 2d 1233 (CA10 1971), vacated and remanded for consideration of mootness sub nom. Upper Pecos Assn. v. Peterson, 409 U. S. 1021 (1972); Calvert Cliffs’ Coordinating Comm. v. Atomic Energy Comm’n, 146 U. S. App. D. C. 33, 449 F. 2d 1109 (1971); City of New York v. United States, 337 F. Supp. 150, 158-160 (EDNY 1972). Thus, I cannot accept the Court’s assertion that the quest…
• Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Corps OF Eng'rs OF the United States Army, 492 F.2d 1123 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …Tribe of Indians v. Morton, 471 F. 2d 1275 (9th Cir. 1973). . See also Upper Pecos Ass’n v. Stans, 452 F. 2d 1233, 1236 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. granted, 406 U.S. 944, 92 S.Ct. 2040, 32 L.Ed.2d 330 (1972), vacated and remanded to determine mootness, 409 U.S. 1021, 93 S.Ct. 458, 34 L.Ed.2d 313 (1972). . This issue has been the subject of an extensive discussion in a recent case note. Substantive Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act: EDF v. Corps of Engineers, 3 Ecology L.Q. 173 (1973). . Court…
• Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. Callaway, 524 F.2d 79 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …hermore, only the Navy has continuing responsibility to see that the dredged channel remains at the proper depth and in good repair. See Upper Pecos Association v. Stans, 452 F. 2d 1233, 1236 (10th Cir. 1971), remanded for determination of mootness, 409 U.S. 1021, 93 S.Ct. 458, 34 L.Ed.2d 313 (1972), appeal dismissed as moot, 500 F. 2d 17 (10th Cir. 1974). Finally, the district court found that no data as to the relative environmental expertise of the two agencies prior to January 1972 had been presented by…