WALTON
v.
VIRGINIA; QUATTRUCCI V. UNITED STATES; FREEMAN V. UNITED STATES; NASH V. AMERADA HESS CORP. ET AL.; KRIKMANIS V. WHITE, MAYOR OF BOSTON, ET AL.; CLARK V. JOHNSON ET AL.; ECKERT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.; ERWING V. UNITED STATES; BLAUNER V. UNITED STATES; HUCKABAY V. WOODMANSEE, JUDGE, ET AL.; GERARDI V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.; PILLIS ET AL. V. GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA ET AL.; IN RE WAYLAND; PILLIS ET AL. V. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL.
WALTON
VIRGINIA; QUATTRUCCI V. UNITED STATES; FREEMAN V. UNITED STATES; NASH V. AMERADA HESS CORP. ET AL.; KRIKMANIS V. WHITE, MAYOR OF BOSTON, ET AL.; CLARK V. JOHNSON ET AL.; ECKERT V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.; ERWING V. UNITED STATES; BLAUNER V. UNITED STATES; HUCKABAY V. WOODMANSEE, JUDGE, ET AL.; GERARDI V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.; PILLIS ET AL. V. GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA ET AL.; IN RE WAYLAND; PILLIS ET AL. V. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL.
409 U.S. 900
Supreme Court of the United States (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Bryant, 534 F.2d 420 (1st Cir. 1976)…ecting the conscientious objector claim. See United States v. Sweet, supra at 262; United States v. Quattrucci, 329 F.Supp. 612, 615 (D.Me.1971), aff’d, 454 F. 2d 58 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 960, 92 S.Ct. 2071, 32 L.Ed.2d 347 reh’g denied, 409 U.S. 900, 93 S.Ct. 187, 34 L.Ed.2d 160 (1972). Affirmed.…