BURNICE EDGAR MANN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BURNICE EDGAR MANN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
198 So. 2d 352
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to vacate judgment and sentence made under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. Chapter 924 Appendix.
The court has examined the briefs and the record in this cause, including the corrected transcript of the proceedings before the trial judge in this cause, and find no irregularities therein.
The appellant having failed to demonstrate- reversible error, the order appealed from is affirmed.
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Simpson v. State, 211 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)…oper identification of the deceased person. In addition, there was no objection made by the defendant, at the time of trial, to this instruction. This claimed error is without merit. See Fla.Stat. § 918.10(4), F.S.A.; Siekman v. State, Fla.App.1967, 198 So. 2d 352. The appellant next claims that the Court committed fundamental error in instructing the jury that the defendant is not entitled to claim that such killing was accidental or self defense. The record reflects that the defendant’s counsel asked for a…