ANDERSON ET AL.

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By

• Sloan v. Lemon, 413 U.S. 825 (U.S. 1973)
  …e Constitution. Having held that tuition reimbursements for the benefit of sectarian schools violate the Establishment Clause, nothing in the Equal Protection Clause will suffice to revive that program. Cf. [*835] Brusca v. State Board of Education, 405 U. S. 1050 (1972), aff’g 332 F. Supp. 275 (ED Mo. 1971). Ill In holding today that Pennsylvania’s post-Lemon, v. Kurtzman attempt to avoid the Establishment Clause’s prohibition against government entanglements with religion has failed to satisfy the paralle…
• United States v. Larson, 555 F.2d 673 (8th Cir. 1977)
  …producible under the Act only if they are signed or otherwise adopted or approved by the witness. Goldberg v. United States, 425 U.S. 94, 96 S.Ct. 1338, 47 L.Ed.2d 603 (1976); United States v. Roberts, 455 F. 2d 930 (5th Cir. 1971), cert, dismissed, 405 U.S. 1050, 92 [*677] S.Ct. 1331, 31 L.Ed.2d 592 (1972); United States v. Turner, 442 F. 2d 1146 (8th Cir. 1971). The record establishes that the trial court questioned the FBI agent as to whether any of the witnesses signed the statements contained therein.…
• Jackson v. State OF Cal., 460 F.2d 282 (9th Cir. 1972)
  …ca v. Missouri ex rel. State Board of Education, 332 F.Supp. 275 (E.D.Mo. 1971). We have deferred decision in this case awaiting the outcome of the appeal in Brusca. The Supreme Court has now affirmed the judgment of the District Court in that case. 405 U.S. 1050, 92 S.Ct. 1493, 31 L.Ed.2d 786 (1972). On the authority of Brusca, judgment is affirmed. . Several additional allegations are made which we find wholly insubstantial. Appellants suggest that the present system of public education in California vio…