EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE OF MISSOURI ET AL.
v.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE OF MISSOURI ET AL.
EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE OF MISSOURI ET AL.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE OF MISSOURI ET AL.
405 U.S. 1016
Supreme Court of the United States (1972)
Caution
Cited by 106 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (50 total)
-
Dearth v. State, 390 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)…th directions that the words “and authorized police officer” be stricken from paragraph 9 of the conditions of probation. MOORE and HURLEY, JJ., concur. . People v. Mason, 5 Cal.3d 759, 97 Cal.Rptr. 302, 488 P. 2d 630 (1971), (dissent) cert. denied 405 U.S. 1016, 92 S.Ct. 1289, 31 L.Ed.2d 478 (1972); Tamez v. State, 534 S.W. 2d 686 (Tex.Cr.App.1976); People v. Keller, 76 Cal.App.3d 827, 143 Cal.Rptr. 184 (4th DCA 1978); People v. Bremmer, 30 Cal.App.3d 1058, 106 Cal.Rptr. 797 (2d DCA 1973); People v. Peters…
-
United States v. Maze, 414 U.S. 395 (U.S. 1974)…h Circuit in the instant case. Five other courts of appeals apparently take a contrary view. E. g., United States v. Kellerman, 431 F. 2d 319 (CA2), cert. denied, 400 U. S. 957 (1970); United States v. Chason, 451 F. 2d 301 (CA2 1971), cert. denied, 405 U. S. 1016 (1972); United States v. Madison, 458 F. 2d 974 (CA2), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 859 (1972); United States v. Ciotti, 469 F. 2d 1204 (CA3 1972), cert. pending, No. 72-6155; Adams v. United States, 312 F. 2d 137 (CA5 1963); Kloian v. United States, 349…1 / 3
-
Emps. of the Dep't of Pub. Health & Welf. of Mo. v. Dep't of Pub. Health & Welf. of Mo., 411 U.S. 279 (U.S. 1973)…tion for rehearing, the Court of Appeals sat en banc and by a closely divided vote set aside the panel decision and affirmed the judgment of the District Court. 452 F. 2d 820. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted. 405 U. S. 1016. The panel of three thought the present case was governed by Parden v. Terminal R. Co., supra. The court sitting en banc thought Parden was distinguishable. That is the central issue argued in the present case. [*282] Farden involved a state-owned…
Previewing 3 of 50 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence