GARCIA-GUILLERN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (117 total)

• Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. Am. Trucking Ass'ns, Inc., 467 U.S. 354 (U.S. 1984)
  …rejection to be ‘“a peremptory form of response to filed tariffs.’” Municipal Light Boards v. FPC, 146 U. S. App. D. C. 294, 299, 450 F. 2d 1341, 1346 (1971) (quoting F. Welch, Cases and Text on Public Utility Regulation 581 (1961)), cert. denied, 405 U. S. 989 (1972). In a subsequent case dealing with the former Civil Aeronautics Board’s rejection authority, another appellate panel approved of Judge Leventhal’s analysis and concluded: “[Rejection is a regulatory device properly used only prior to a tariff…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Ashdown, 509 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …ct are mailings in furtherance of the scheme. United States v. MacClain, 10 Cir. 1974, 501 F. 2d 1006, 1012; see also United States v. Miles, 8 Cir. 1973, 483 F. 2d 1372; United States v. Strauss, 7 Cir. 1971, 452 F. 2d 375, 380, cert. denied, 1972, 405 U.S. 989, 92 S.Ct. 1252, 31 L.Ed.2d 455; United States v. Porter, 8 Cir. 1971, 441 F. 2d 1204, 1211. In this case, each of the investors named in Counts 9 — 11 testified as to the “lulling” effect of the mailing. Receipt of the annual report in the mail was…
• Papago Tribal Util. Auth. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 628 F.2d 235 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …The Commission acknowledged that it has the authority to reject filings which are “ ‘patently . deficient in form or a substantive nullity’.” Joint Appendix (JA) 70 (citing Municipal Light Boards v. FPC, 450 F. 2d 1341 (D.C.Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989, 92 S.Ct. 1251, 31 L.Ed.2d 445 (1972)). However, it found that intervenor’s filing was “in substantial compliance” with the filing rules, and that petitioner’s arguments raised factual issues not ripe for summary disposition. See JA 70. Thus the C…

  ← 1 / 2 →