WHDH, INC.
v.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT; AND WHDH, INC. V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL.
WHDH, INC.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT; AND WHDH, INC. V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL.
405 U.S. 982
Supreme Court of the United States (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Iowa Independent Bankers v. Bd. OF Governors OF the Fed. Reserve Sys., 511 F.2d 1288 (D.C. Cir. 1975)…on Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.” Petitioner’s Br. at 14. See, e. g., Brown Enterprises, Inc. v. Fulton, Iowa, 192 N.W. 2d 773 (1971); State v. Kappos, Iowa, 189 N.W. 2d 563, cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 405 U.S. 982, 92 S.Ct. 1242, 31 L.Ed.2d 449 (1971); Becker v. Board of Education, 258 Iowa 277, 138 N.W. 2d 909 (1965); Chicago and Northwestern Ry. Co. v. Fachman, 255 Iowa 989, 125 N.W. 2d 210 (1963). Thus, its argument rests on the proposition that although…
-
Reed v. The Bd. OF Election Comm'rs OF the City OF Cambridge, 459 F.2d 121 (1st Cir. 1972)…92 S.Ct. 77, 30 L.Ed.2d 62 (1971), apparently because of a possible construction of Virginia law which could have obviated the need to reach the constitutional issues involved in the case. The Supreme Court affirmed the abstention order on March 20, 405 U.S. 982, 92 S. Ct. 1253, 31 L.Ed.2d 449 (1972). Whether the Court felt that Virginia law left an open question, or whether it felt that plaintiffs lacked standing until they had, factually, lost their claim in the state adjudicatory process, cannot be told…
-
Zicarelli v. Dietz, 633 F.2d 312 (3d Cir. 1980)…rom which the jurors were drawn and that inclusion of the other counties would only slightly increase the probability of the presence of rural jurors on a particular jury. Id. See also State v. Kappos, 189 N.W. 2d 563, 564 (Iowa 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 982, 92 S.Ct. 1246, 31 L.Ed.2d 449 (1972). Furthermore, it has also been held that there is no constitutional right to a jury chosen from the division where the offense was committed or from the entire district which includes that division. In United S…