RUSSO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134 (U.S. 1974)
  …comprehensive complex administrative program, the, administrative process must have a reasonable opportunity to , evolve procedures to meet needs as they arise.” Cf. Torres v. New York State Department of Labor, 333 F. Supp. 341 (SDNY 1971), aff’d, 405 U. S. 949 (1972). Necessarily, to some extent, the Court must share with Congress, in an area where one is called upon to judge the efficacy of particular procedures, a role in defining constitutional requirements, and Congress explicitly left it to the discr…
• Fusari v. Steinberg, 419 U.S. 379 (U.S. 1975)
  …y to inform the Court of any development which may conceivably affect an outcome. Second, although I agree wholeheartedly with the Court’s reasoned discussion of the tension between the summary affirmance in Torres v. New York State Dept. of Labor, 405 U. S. 949 (1972), aff’g 333 F. Supp. 341 (SDNY 1971), and the Court’s opinion in California Human Resources Dept. v. Java, 402 U. S. 121 (1971), ante, at 388-389, n. 15, we might well go beyond that and make explicit what is implicit in some prior holdings. E…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Richardson v. Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24 (U.S. 1974)
  …o the benefits allegedly wrongfully withheld pending the hearing. A case had already come to this Court in just such a posture, and the Court had summarily affirmed the judgment of the three-judge court. Torres v. New York State Department of Labor, 405 U. S. 949 (1972), but see 410 U. S. 971 (1973) (dissenting opinion to denial of rehearing). It was a failure to satisfy the “evading review” element of the test that led the Court to remand Burney for consideration of mootness. In the absence of such an or…