POPPENHEIMER ET AL.

v.

CLTY OF MEMPHIS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (40 total)

• United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
• Litton Sys., Inc. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 700 F.2d 785 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …tive efforts directed at government agencies acting in a proprietary capacity — i.e., as buyers or sellers. See, e.g., Sacramento Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 150, 440 F. 2d 1096, 1099 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 826, 92 S.Ct. 57, 30 L.Ed.2d 54 (1971); George R. Whitten Jr., Inc. v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc., 424 F. 2d 25, 33 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 850, 91 S.Ct. 54, 27 L.Ed.2d 88 (1970). A Fifth Circuit case, and a district court decision in the Th…
• United States v. Lemonakis, 485 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …banc in Levin, supra, this is not one of “those particular situations where a fair trial may have been significantly blurred” by the nondisclosure. 408 F. 2d at 1222. See Xydas v. United States, 144 U.S.App.D.C. 184, 445 F. 2d 660, 667, cert. denied 404 U.S. 826, 92 S.Ct. 57, 30 L.Ed.2d 54 (1971). Appellant’s emphasis on the prosecution’s view of Enten as the “mastermind” of the conspiracy is unpersuasive, first, because our careful examination of the lengthy record before us reveals the prosecution did not…