LEWIS ET AL.
v.
BROWN, CHIEF JUDGE, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.; AND KELLY ET AL. V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. (UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST)
LEWIS ET AL.
BROWN, CHIEF JUDGE, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.; AND KELLY ET AL. V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. (UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST)
404 U.S. 819
Supreme Court of the United States (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Evansville-Vanderburgh Airport Auth. Dist. v. DELTA Airlines, Inc., 405 U.S. 707 (U.S. 1972)…the right to travel. The Superior Court, without decision, transferred the action to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, and that court sustained the constitutionality of the statute. 111 N. H. 5, 273 A. 2d 676 (1971). We noted probable jurisdiction, 404 U. S. 819 (1971).3 We affirm. We begin our analysis with consideration of the contention of the commercial airlines in both cases that the charge is constitutionally invalid under the Court’s decision in Crandall v. Nevada, 6 Wall. 35 (1868). There the Court…
-
Richardson v. Wright, 405 U.S. 208 (U.S. 1972)…ess may be satisfied with something less than the ‘opportunity’ [to participate] specified in [Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U. S. 254].” Id., at 388. We noted probable jurisdiction in these cross-appeals to evaluate the opinion below in light of Goldberg. 404 U. S. 819. Now, however, it is suggested that the Secretary has so far complied with the instructions of the District Court to formulate new procedures that we should remand the cases to the District Court for further proceedings in light of these new requir…1 / 2