SCHLETTE
v.
CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY ET AL.
SCHLETTE
CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY ET AL.
401 U.S. 1012
Supreme Court of the United States (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Associated Gen. Contractors OF Cal. v. SAN Francisco Unified Sch. Dist., 616 F.2d 1381 (9th Cir. 1980)…e action. See North Carolina State Bd. of Educ. v. Swann, 402 U.S. 43, 45-46, 91 S.Ct. 1284, 1285-1286, 28 L.Ed.2d 586 (1971); San Francisco Unified School Dist. v. Johnson, 3 Cal.3d 937, 955, 479 P. 2d 669, 680, 92 Cal.Rptr. 309, 320, cert. denied, 401 U.S. 1012, 91 S.Ct. 1266, 28 L.Ed.2d 549 (1971). . Moreover, the contrary legislative determination fatally undermines the propriety of the Board’s findings in support of its affirmative action policy. However, the. Supreme Court has held that quota-type aff…
-
Levine v. Courtland C. Peyton, 444 F.2d 525 (4th Cir. 1971)…, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969), then May v. Peyton, 398 F. 2d 476 (4th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, Cox v. May, 402 U.S. 948, 91 S.Ct. 1602, 29 L.Ed.2d 117 (1971), and McLaren v. Peyton, No. 12,-450 (4th Cir. 1968) (mem. decis.), cert. denied, Cox v. McLaren, 401 U.S. 1012, 91 S.Ct. 1246, 28 L.Ed.2d 550 (1971). We reaffirm the results of May and McLaren. Although we recognize Pearce is somewhat more limited in scope than Patton, we think that the Supreme Court was concerned, as we are, that a defendant be freed of th…