ZEZOFF

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Piazzola v. Watkins, 442 F.2d 284 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …s free of the specific criminal activity here involved — the possession of the drug, marihuana. The regulation was a reasonable means of embodying this interest. Cf. Pratz v. Louisiana Polytechnic Institute, 316 F.Supp. 872 (D.C.W.D.La., 1970), aff. 401 U.S. 1004, 91 S.Ct. 1252, 28 L.Ed. 2d 541 (1971). Marinshaw was found to be familiar with the regulation. When he chose to place the evidence of this criminal conduct in his dormitory room he knowingly exposed this material to inspections by officials of the…
• Prostrollo v. The Univ. OF S.D., 507 F.2d 775 (8th Cir. 1974)
  …v. Royster, 410 U.S. 263, 93 S.Ct. 1055, 35 L.Ed.2d 282 (1973). We find this test to be met here. Accord, Pratz v. Louisiana Polytechnic Institute, 316 F.Supp. 872 (W.D.La.1970), appeal dismissed, 401 U.S. 951, 91 S.Ct. 1186, 28 L.Ed.2d 234, aff’d, 401 U.S. 1004, 91 S.Ct. 1252, 28 L.Ed.2d 541 (1971); Poynter v. Drevdahl, 359 F.Supp. 1137 (W.D.Mich.1972). The judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause is remanded to the district court to enter judgment in favor of the defendants Dr. Richard Bo…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Cooper v. Honorable Enoch T. NIX, 496 F.2d 1285 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …ference which, if it can be shown to be substantially related to the educational process, has been specifically sanctioned by the three-judge court decision in Pratz v. Louisiana Polytechnic Institute, W.D.La.1970, 316 F.Supp. 872, aff’d mem., 1971, 401 U.S. 1004, 91 S.Ct. 1252, 28 L.Ed.2d 541. In my view this Court could have eradicated the errors in the district court’s order simply by modifying it to provide that for so long as defendants continue to exempt students age 23 and older from the on-campus li…

  ← 1 / 2 →