LISKER

v.

KELLEY, SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge re Harvey N. Shenberg. In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge re Alfonso C. Sepe, 632 So. 2d 42 (Fla. 1991)
• Communist Party of Indiana v. Whitcomb, 414 U.S. 441 (U.S. 1974)
  …ed, or was within the Board’s [*447] “proseeutorial discretion.” We note, however, that the only relevant testimony in the District Court, given by the Board’s clerk, is entirely silent as to the reasons behind the omission. E. g., Usker v. Kelley, 401 U. S. 928 (1971), summarily aff’g 315 F. Supp. 777 (1970); Gerende v. Board of Supervisors, 341 U. S. 56 (1951), presenting a constitutional challenge to a Maryland statute imposing a loyalty requirement on candidates for municipal office rested on “the narro…
• Crete Carrier Corp. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 577 F.2d 49 (8th Cir. 1978)
  …olving more than three states through ‘modified Procedure.’ ” Ruan Transport Corp. v. United States, 361 F.Supp. 371, 374 (S.D.Iowa 1973), citing Boat Transit, Inc. v. United States, 1970 Federal Carrier Cases, Section 82,215 (E.D.Mich.1970), aff’d, 401 U.S. 928, 91 S.Ct. 934, 28 L.Ed.2d 210 (1971). It is with this in mind that we review Crete Carrier’s allegations of error. [*51] III. Crete Carrier contends that there were four areas of dispute requiring an oral hearing and cross-examination for their re…