KAMSLER

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Weinstein, 511 F.2d 622 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …rand Jury proceedings by restricting disclosure to the exceptional case where a particularized need is shown.5 Since Selective Service files are confidential in nature, see United States v. Weintraub, 429 F. 2d 658, 661 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1014, 91 S.Ct. 572, 27 L.Ed.2d 627 (1971); United States v. Strayhorn, 471 F. 2d 661, 665 n.4 (2d Cir. 1972); 32 C.F.R. § 1608.-2,6 they should not be disclosed to persons other than the government officials concerned or to the defendant or his authorize…
• United States v. King, 455 F.2d 345 (1st Cir. 1972)
  …ive service files. The best evidence of such writings was of course the writings themselves . . ..” 416 F. 2d at 205. Cf. United States v. Dobie, 444 F. 2d 417 (4th Cir. 1971); United States v. Weintraub, 429 F. 2d 658 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1014, 91 S.Ct. 572, 27 L.Ed.2d 627 (1971). While we adopt Baker, we apply it to the present case only with some hesitation. Even though, the defendant having raised an order of call issue, the burden of proof shifts to the government, the burden is pecu…
• United States v. Strayhorn, 471 F.2d 661 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …defendant that his order for induction came out of proper sequence, or, conversely, that others who should have been called before him were not. Its recognition by this court, United States v. Weintraub, 429 F. 2d 658 (2nd Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1014, 91 S.Ct. 572, 27 L.Ed. 627 (1971), and by others, Yates v. United States, 404 F. 2d 462 (1st Cir. 1968), rehearing denied, 407 F. 2d 50 (1969); United States v. Dudley, 451 F. 2d 1300 (6th Cir. 1971); United States v. Baker, 416 F. 2d 202 (9th Cir.…