CASH

v.

TENNESSEE

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• United States v. Isaacs, 493 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …in the discretion of the trial judge whose rulings will not be disturbed in the absence of abuse of discretion. Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129, 132, 88 S.Ct. 748, 19 L.Ed.2d 956; and United States v. Pate, 7 Cir., 426 F. 2d 1083, 1086, cert. denied 400 U.S. 995, 91 S.Ct. 469, 27 L.Ed.2d 445. The cautionary instruction of the court rendered the cross-examination harmless. See Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 135, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476, and United States v. Kahn, 7 Cir., 381 F. 2d 824, 838, cer…
• United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …one of the exceptions to the general rule that evidence of “other crimes” not charged in the indictment is inadmissible in the prosecution’s case-in-ehief. See United States ex rel. Durso v. Pate, 426 F. 2d 1083, 1086 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 995, 91 S.Ct. 469, 27 L.Ed.2d 445 (1971). As in most questions regarding the admissibility of evidence, trial judges are given wide discretion to balance the proffered item’s probative value against its prejudicial effect. See United States v. Gaus, 471…
• United States v. Cerone, 452 F.2d 274 (7th Cir. 1971)
  …s denial of motions for severance may constitute reversible error “only if prejudice is so clearly shown that refusal of a severance is an abuse of discretion.” United States ex rel. Durso v. Pate, 426 F. 2d 1083, 1089 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 995, 91 S.Ct. 469, 27 L.Ed.2d 445 (1971). No such showing of prejudice has been made here. Angelini argues that the disclosure to the FBI by the telephone company of its toll call records with regard to telephones listed to Bombacino, Sammy Molose, Mod…