FELDSTEIN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Dancy v. State, 259 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
  …certain procedural rules may warrant the judge’s exercise of discretion in ordering the exclusion of a defense witness. Braswell v. State, Fla.App.1970, 230 So. 2d 192, cert. den. (1970), 400 U.S. 873, 91 S.Ct. 106, 27 L.Ed.2d 111, reh. den. (1970), 400 U.S. 920, 91 S.Ct. 176, 27 L.Ed.2d 161. We are of the opinion that the lower court abused its discretion in excluding the defense witness, because it was not [*210] clearly shown that there was a violation of any procedural rule.1 The appellant argues that…
• Nixon v. The Honorable John J. Sirica, 487 F.2d 700 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …ent President may not be prosecuted because of the Impeachment Clause, however, might not preclude criminal prosecution of any co-conspirators. Cf. Rogers v. United States, supra; Feld-stein v. United States, 429 F. 2d 1092 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 400 U.S. 920, 91 S.Ot. 174, 27 L.Ed.2d 159 (1970) ; Cross v. United States. 392 F. 2d 360 (8th Cir. 1968). . [E]xecutive privilege will not be invoked as to any testimony concerning possible criminal conduct or discussions of possible criminal conduct, in matte…
• United States v. Mohammad Reza Mehrmanesh, 689 F.2d 822 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …sh that identification of the principal is not an essential element of a conviction for aiding and abetting. See United States v. Chenaur, 552 F. 2d 294, 300 (9th Cir. 1977); Feldstein v. United States, 429 F. 2d 1092, 1095 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 920, 91 S.Ct. 174, 27 L.Ed.2d 159 (1970). Finally, we reject the claim that the prosecutor made improper remarks in closing argument that caused incurable prejudice to Mehrmanesh. The record does not support the contention that the prosecutor commented…