HY-VEE FOOD STORES, INC.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Davis v. Hill Eng'g, Inc., 549 F.2d 314 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …plaintiff and others similarly situated from defects. The district court properly supported its determination of Hill’s negligence with reference analogously to Nivens v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co., 5 Cir.1970, 425 F. 2d 114, cert. denied, 400 U.S. 879, 91 S.Ct. 121, 27 L.Ed.2d 116 in which a railroad employee sued his employer under the FELA. In discussing the employer’s obligations the Nivens Court concluded: This duty includes a duty to inspect the third party’s property for hazards and to tak…
• United States v. Anderson, 481 F.2d 685 (4th Cir. 1973)
  …efendants a pre-trial list of the Government’s witnesses. Nor were the defendants entitled to a summary of the testimony to be given by such witnesses. The Court in Sendejas v. United States (9th Cir. 1970) 428 F. 2d 1040, 1046, cert. denied [*694] 400 U.S. 879, 91 S.Ct. 127, 27 L.Ed.2d 116, correctly stated the controlling rule in this connection thus: “There is nothing as plain as the statute [i. e., the Jencks Act] in terms of stating that no pretrial statement in the possession of the government shall…
• United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …where in a similar factual setting the Court of Appeals issued a writ of mandamus to deny the defense access to a co-conspirator’s statements until he testified at trial. See Sendejas v. United States, 428 F. 2d 1040, 1046 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 400 U.S. 879, 91 S.Ct. 127, 27 L.Ed.2d 116 (1970). III. We should note finally that we see nothing inconsistent between our holding that the trial judge is prevented by the Jencks Act from ordering pretrial disclosure of statements made by a prospective govern…