GUERIN

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Citator

Cited By

• Jardien v. Winston Network, 888 F.2d 1151 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …dence to support the jury verdict. See Arney v. United States, 479 F. 2d 653, 659 (9th Cir.1973) (refusing to consider hearsay evidence in reviewing grant of summary judgment); Norris v. United States, 423 F. 2d 695, 695-96 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 838, [*1155] 91 S.Ct. 76, 27 L.Ed.2d 71 (1970). For reasons explained later, infra Part I.B.2, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding these exhibits. . Because it is unclear whether the defendant ever actually offere…
• Cooks v. Spalding, 660 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …ally State v. Allman, 19 Wash. App. 169, 173, 573 P. 2d 1329, 1332 (1977); Wash.Crim.R. 6.1(b)(1). Violations of state law, without more, do not deprive a defendant of due process. La Brasca v. Misterly, 423 F. 2d 708, 709 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 838, 91 S.Ct. 77, 27 L.Ed.2d 72 (1970); Quigg v. Crist, 466 F.Supp. 544, 549 (D.Mont.1978), aff’d, 616 F. 2d 1107 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 922, 101 S.Ct. 323, 66 L.Ed.2d 150 (1980). See generally Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S.Ct. 1893…
• Kelsey D. Bartlett v. Connors, 455 F.2d 459 (6th Cir. 1972)
  …suits were pending in the State courts, the Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed the action of the State Court of Appeals denying writs of prohibition and mandamus. State ex rel. Bartlett v. Baynes, 20 Ohio St.2d 129, 253 N.E. 2d 748 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 838, 91 S.Ct. 77, 27 L.E'd.2d 72. For other litigation in Federal Courts, see opinion of then District Judge Paul C. Weick in Bartlett v. Duty, D.C., 174 F.Supp. 94, 84 Ohio Law Abst. 555. (1959), and Bartlett v. Weimer, 244 F. 2d 955 (6th Cir. 1957), a…