CRANE CO.

v.

WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (66 total)

• United States v. Mandujano, 425 U.S. 564 (U.S. 1976)
  …8) (warning required for one “ 'virtually in the position of a defendant’ ”); Mattox v. Carson, 295 F. Supp. 1054, 1059 (MD Fla. 1969) (Miranda warnings required for “potential defendants”), rev’d on other grounds, 424 F. 2d 202 (CA5), cert. denied, 400 U. S. 822 (1970); United States v. Haim, 218 F. Supp. 922, 932 (SDNY 1963) (warning required for “potential” defendant); United States v. DiGrazia, 213 F. Supp. 232, 234 (ND Ill. 1963) (warning and execution of formal waiver required for any witness); United…
• United States v. Isaacs, 493 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …ury cases this means that where one offense is committed, all the false declarations pertaining to that offense can be charged in one count without making that count duplicitous. See Vitello v. United States, 9 Cir., 425 F. 2d 416, 418, cert. denied 400 U.S. 822, 91 S.Ct. 43, 27 L.Ed.2d 50; United States v. Edmondson, 5 Cir., 410 F. 2d 670, 673, n. 6, cert. denied 396 U.S. 966, 90 S.Ct. 444, 24 L.Ed.2d 430. Kerner next contends that the perjury conviction was invalid under Bronston v. United States, 409 U.…
• Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corporaion, 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …shed by the mere solicitation of votes, in a very real sense the shareholders were deceived by the action of those making the corporate decision to merge. Cf. Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F. 2d 787, 797 (2nd Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822, 91 S.Ct. 41, 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970). See also Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F. 2d at 635. We have previously said that a controlling shareholder’s “ability to push through the merger — with or without any other shareholder’s vote — cannot by…