BECKMAN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• United States v. King, 552 F.2d 833 (9th Cir. 1976)
  …well, as a criminal defendant, could refuse to take the stand at the joint trial, U.S.Const. amend. V., and King could not compel his testimony or comment on its absence. United States v. De La Cruz Bellinger, 422 F. 2d 723 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 942, 90 S.Ct. 1860, 26 L.Ed.2d 278 (1970). See 18 U.S.C. § 3481; Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed.2d 106 (1965). King claims he was therefore denied an opportunity by cross- [*845] examination to confront the witness against h…
• United States v. Donaway, 447 F.2d 940 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …of justice against possible prejudice to a defendant. It need not exercise its discretion by ordering separate trials unless a joint trial is manifestly prejudicial. United States v. De La Cruz Bellinger, 422 F. 2d 723 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 942, 90 S.Ct. 1860, 26 L.Ed.2d 278 (1970); Parker v. United States, 404 F. 2d 1193 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 1004, 89 S.Ct. 1602, 22 L.Ed.2d 782. Whether there is an abuse of discretion depends on the facts in each case. Daut v. United Sta…
• United States v. Cozzetti, 441 F.2d 344 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …nt trial was manifestly prejudicial. Parker v. United States (9 Cir. 1968) 404 F. 2d 1193, 1194, cert. denied, 394 U.S. 1004, 89 S.Ct. 1602, 22 L.Ed.2d 782 (1969); United States v. De La Cruz Bellinger (9 Cir. 1970) 422 F. 2d 723, 726, cert. denied, 398 U.S. 942, 90 S.Ct. 1860, 26 L.Ed.2d 278 (1970). We cannot say on the facts of this case that there was an abuse of discretion. Counsel and the trial judge repeatedly made the jury aware of limitations in the admissibility of the evidence. The charge to the…

  ← 1 / 2 →