LEITCHFIELD MANUFACTURING CO., INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1970-06-01
No. 1426
Mr. Justice Black would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument., Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Harlan would affirm., Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or disposition of this case.
398 U.S. 280 Supreme Court of the United States (1970) Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for redetermination upon the basis of the record of the Interstate Commerce Commission proceedings.

Mr. Justice Black would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Harlan would affirm.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or disposition of this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Keller Indus., Inc. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 449 F.2d 163 (5th Cir. 1971)
    …t or by the Court of Claims, shall be brought only in the court which referred the question or issue.” 28 U.S.C.A. § 1398(b). . Shippers cite Leitchfield Manufacturing Co. v. United States, W.D.Ky., 1970, 312 F.Supp. 430, vacated and remanded 1970, 398 U.S. 280, 90 S.Ct. 1729, 26 L.Ed. 2d 232; Interstate Motor Freight System [*167] v. United States, W.D.Mich., 1965, 243 F.Supp. 868; Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States, M.D.Fla., 1965, 242 F.Supp. 490, aff’d, 1965, 382 U.S. 161, 86 S.Ct. 316, 15…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw