BELT & TERMINAL REALTY CO. ET AL.

v.

HOPKINS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Miley, 513 F.2d 1191 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …ack’s explanation was disingenuous, we find his questioning to have been an unexceptionable effort “to clarify testimony and assist the jury in understanding the evidence,” United States v. Tyminski, 418 F. 2d 1060, 1062 (2 Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1075, 90 S.Ct. 1523, 25 L.Ed.2d 810 (1970). IV. Single Conspiracy. We now reach, at long last, the principal, and disturbing, issue on these appeals. All the appellants urge vigorously that the Government failed to establish [*1206] the existence of a…
• United States v. McCORD, 509 F.2d 334 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …ates, 395 F. 2d 976, 983 (5th Cir. 1968); United States v. Bukowski, 435 F. 2d 1094, 1109 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 911, 91 S.Ct. 874, 27 L.Ed.2d 809 (1971); United States v. Tyminski, 418 F. 2d 1060, 1062 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1075, 90 S.Ct. 1523, 25 L.Ed.2d 810 (1970); Note, Disqualification of Judges for Bias in the Federal Courts, 79 Harv.L.Rev. 1435 (1966). . See Carrado v. United States, 93 U.S.App. D.C. 183, 193, 210 F. 2d 712, 722 (1953), cert. denied sub nom. Atkins v…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Liddy, 509 F.2d 428 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …r. 1948); Annot. 67 A.L.R.2d 538, 550-551 (1959). . Quercia v. United States, supra; United States v. Barbour, supra, 137 U.S.App.D.C. at 117-118, 420 F. 2d at 1320-1321; United States v. Tyminski, 418 F. 2d 1060, 1062 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1075, 90 S.Ct. 1523, 25 L.Ed.2d 810 (1970); Billeci v. United States, supra. . See Quercia v. United States, supra, 289 U.S. at 470, 53 S.Ct. 698; United States v. Green, 139 U.S.App.D.C. 75, 81, 429 F. 2d 754, 760 (1970); Bursten v. United States, 395…