PHIPPS ET UX.

v.

UNITED STATES; BEARDEN ET AL. V. OKLAHOMA; SNOWDEN ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; POSEY ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; BOWERS V. UNITED STATES; ANDERSON V. SOUTH CAROLINA; RAMIREZ V. EYMAN, WARDEN; ALERS V. MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN; SHIPP V. CRAVEN, WARDEN; SAFFIOTI V. CATHERWOOD, INDUSTRIAL COMMISSIONER OF NEW YORK; GOFF V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Wilson, 500 F.2d 715 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …against the appellant was so overwhelming that any possible error in deleting them was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Posey v. United States, 416 F. 2d 545 (5 Cir. 1969), cert. den. 397 U.S. 946, 90 S.Ct. 964, 25 L. [*723] Ed.2d 127, reh. den. 397 U.S. 1031, 90 S.Ct. 1267, 25 L.Ed.2d 544 (1969), Hoover v. Beto, 467 F. 2d 516 (5 Cir. 1972), cert. den. 409 U.S. 1086, 93 S.Ct. 703, 34 L.Ed.2d 673 (1972), United States v. Davis, 418 F. 2d 59 (9 Cir. 1969), Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1…
• United States v. Anderson, 481 F.2d 685 (4th Cir. 1973)
  …nst the claim of “particularized need” was clearly erroneous. United States v. Bryant (4th Cir. 1966) 364 F. 2d 598, 600; Posey v. United States (5th Cir. 1969) 416 F. 2d 545, 557, cert. denied 397 U.S. 946, 90 S.Ct. 964, 25 L.Ed.2d 127, reh. denied 397 U. S. 1031, 90 S.Ct. 1267, 25 L.Ed.2d 544. This ruling conforms with the Jencks Act, as amended in 1970, Section 3500(e)(3), 18 U.S.C.8 and is in line with the majority rule as established in the several circuits. United States v. [*693] Daras (9th Cir. 1972)…
• United States v. Cheramie, 520 F.2d 325 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …2d 652; United States v. Fonseca, 5 Cir. 1971, 490 F. 2d 464, 471, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1072, 95 S.Ct. 660, 42 L.Ed.2d 668; Posey v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 416 F. 2d 545, cert. denied, 397 U.S. 946, 90 S.Ct. 965, 25 L.Ed.2d 127, reh. denied, 397 U.S. 1031, 90 S.Ct. 1267, 25 L.Ed.2d 544. However, where the trial judge strays from these recognized parameters, this Court unflinchingly acts to correct the error.6 See, e. g., United States v. Amaya, 5 Cir. 1975, 509 F. 2d 8; Powell v. United States, supra…