STATE AND G. I. RIDGEWAY
v.
CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's validation of $389,000 in refunding bonds for the City of Daytona Beach. The decision was based on the precedent set in a companion case with identical legal issues.
Yes, the issuance of the refunding bonds was valid. The court affirmed the lower court's validation decree.
“The present appeal deserves no special or detailed discussion in view of our holding in a companion case involving a like issue of refunding bonds designated as Series "A," issue of 1936, refunding bonds of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida.”
This quote explains the court's reasoning for not providing a detailed analysis, relying instead on a prior decision.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe City of Daytona Beach sought validation of $389,000 in refunding bonds. The Circuit Court of Volusia County granted the validation. The State of F…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
This was a petition by the City of Daytona Beach, a municipal corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Florida, for the validation of $389,000.00 refunding bonds, issue of 1936, Series “B,” of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida. The *732decree below was in favor of validating the bonds, and the State of Florida; as respondent to the proceedings, has brought that decree to this Court for review.
The present appeal deserves no special or detailed discussion in view of our holding in a companion case involving a like issue of refunding bonds designated as Series “A,” issue of 1936, refunding bonds of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida. Upon the authority of our decision in the companion case, the decree of the Circuit Court of Volusia County validating the bonds involved in the instant case is affirmed. See: State v. City of Daytona Beach, 126 Fla. 728, 171 Sou. Rep. 814.
It is therefore considered, adjudged and decreed by this Court that the Circuit Court’s validation decree, in manner and form as entered, and herein appealed from, be and the same is hereby affirmed, and that mandate in conformity with this judgment of the Supreme Court do issue within ten days as provided for by Section 5108 C. G. L., Chapter 11864, Sections 1, 2, Acts 1927, if no petition for rehearing has been filed within that period.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.