O'HAIR ET AL.
v.
PAINE ET AL.
O'HAIR ET AL.
PAINE ET AL.
397 U.S. 531
Supreme Court of the United States (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mayhue's Super Liquor Store, Inc. v. Meiklejohn, 426 F.2d 142 (5th Cir. 1970)…tantial in the jurisdictional sense. Nonetheless, appellant simultaneously took her case to both this Court and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court dismissed the case in language identical to that employed by it in this case. O’Hair v. Paine, 1970, 397 U.S. 531, 90 S.Ct. 1259, 25 L.Ed.2d 528. . The extent is illustrated by the relinquishment by Congress of its power to regulate this part of interstate commerce. Brown, Free Will in the Frontiers of Federalism, 58 Mich.L.Rev. 999, 1011 n. 40 (1960).…
-
Madalyn Murray O'Hair v. Paine, 432 F.2d 66 (5th Cir. 1970)…space flights. Contending that NASA’s participation amounted to an unconstitutional abuse of legislative power, she demands injunctory relief. The Supreme Court has already disposed of Mrs. O’Hair’s three-judge court argument. O’Hair v. Paine, 1970, 397 U.S. 531, 90 S.Ct. 1259, 25 L.Ed.2d 528.…