NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY FIRST MORTGAGE 4% BONDHOLDERS COMMITTEE
v.
SMITH, TRUSTEE OF PROPERTY OF NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD CO., ET AL.; MANUFACTURERS HANOVER TRUST CO., TRUSTEE V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N. A., TRUSTEE V. PENN CENTRAL CO. ET AL.; PENN CENTRAL CO. V. MANUFACTURERS HANOVER TRUST CO., TRUSTEE, ET AL.; AND UNITED STATES ET AL. V. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY FIRST MORTGAGE 4% BONDHOLDERS COMMITTEE ET AL.; NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY FIRST MORTGAGE 4% BONDHOLDERS COMMITTEE V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; MANUFACTURERS HANOVER TRUST CO., TRUSTEE V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; AND CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N. A., TRUSTEE V. UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1970-02-02
Nos. 914; No. 916; No. 920; No. 1038; No. 1057; No. 915; No. 917; No. 921
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these matters.
396 U.S. 1056 Supreme Court of the United States (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (U.S. 1970)
    …he order of the three-judge court and, with respect to the judgment of the reorganization court, granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals before judgment, accelerating briefing and argument to permit disposition of these cases at the current Term. 396 U. S. 1056.50 [*419] II We first consider the dual review to which the District Courts in New York and Connecticut subjected the price determinations of the Interstate Commerce Commission. From the outset all the parties in the three-judge court recognized th…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw