GENE RANDLE, APPELLANT,
v.
MRS. KATHLEEN L. HUNTLEY, APPELLEE
GENE RANDLE, APPELLANT,
MRS. KATHLEEN L. HUNTLEY, APPELLEE
194 So. 2d 646
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed upon authority of Rivers v. Brown, 62 Fla. 258, 56 So. 553 (1911); Forbes v. Ft. Lauderdale Mercantile Co., 83 Fla. 66, 90 So. 821 (1922) ; Fannin v. Fritter, 127 Fla. 97, 172 So. 691 (1937); Rothstein v. Forty-Five, Twenty-Five, Inc., Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 565.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Boston v. Jewish Cmty. Ctrs. of S. Fla., Inc., 40 Fla. Supp. 88 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1974)…. 1964, 166 So. 2d 152, 153. As the Sundie case permits, he thus sought to recover “the expenses of preparing for performance.” (page 153). See also Sullivan v. McMillan, 26 Fla. 543, 8 So. 450; Sanchez v. Crandon Wholesale Drug Co., Fla. App. 1967, 194 So. 2d 646. The interesting issue raised in this case arises from the fact that, solely in order — as he said, and as the jury apparently believed ■— to prepare himself for his promised work for the YMHA, he went to a two-year post-graduate course at Barry Co…
Authorities Cited
- Forbes v. The Fort Lauderdale Mercantile Co., 83 Fla. 66 (Fla. 1922)
- Rivers v. Brown, 62 Fla. 258 (Fla. 1911)
- Fannin v. Mrs. Nellie E. Fritter, 127 Fla. 97 (Fla. 1937)
- Rothstein v. Forty-Five, 145 So. 2d 565 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)
- Russell v. Mathews, 127 Fla. 169 (Fla. 1937)