DUCKETT

v.

MARSHALL ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Noble C. Beasley, 519 F.2d 233 (8th Cir. 1975)
  …denials. E. g., United States v. Crisona, 416 F. 2d 107, 116 (2nd Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 961, 90 S.Ct. 993, 25 L.Ed.2d 253 (1970); United States v. Harris, 409 F. 2d 77, 80-81 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub. nom., Venning v. United States, 396 U.S. 965, 90 S.Ct. 447, 24 L.Ed.2d 430 (1969). Similarly, Beasley’s contention that the trial court’s refusal to permit further cross-examination into Diamond’s status as an informer violated his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation is baseless. Considera…
• United States v. Am. Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp., 433 F.2d 174 (3d Cir. 1970)
  …1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 961, 90 [*203] S.Ct. 993, 25 L.Ed.2d 253 (1970)United States v. Evanchik, 413 F. 2d 950, 952-953 (2d Cir. 1969); United States v. Harris, 409 F. 2d 77, 80-81 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub. nom., Venning v. United States, 396 U.S. 965, 90 S.Ct. 447 24 L.Ed. 430 (1969). It follows that appellants’ motion to have the Kramer statements produced to them must be denied. Appellants also contend that the' Kramer. statements should have been produced at trial pursuant to the Jencks Act.…
• United States v. Glasser, 443 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …sion to a court; and that in any case Propper waived his privilege when he authorized its disclosure to the court. See Taylor v. United States, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 222 F. 2d 398 (1955); Ramer v. United States, 411 F. 2d 30 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 965, 90 S.Ct. 445, 24 L.Ed.2d 431 (1969). He argues further that he was entitled to production of Dr. Cerulli’s report not only for the purpose of inquiring into Propper’s mental condition, but also for the purpose of learning whether it contained a p…